AHRQ: Methodological Evaluation of Observational Research

7 02 2011

Development of Quality Criteria To Evaluate Nontherapeutic  Studies of Incidence, Prevalence, or Risk Factors of Chronic Diseases: Pilot Study of New Checklists:

  • Methodological Evaluation of Observational REsearch (MORE)—Observational Studies of Incidence or Prevalence of Chronic Diseases
  • Methodological Evaluation of Observational Research (MEVORECH)—Observational Studies of Risk Factors of Chronic Diseases

Descargar aqui

Abstract

Objective. To develop two checklists for the quality of observational studies of incidence or risk factors of diseases.

Study design and setting. Initial development of the checklists was based on a systematic literature review. The checklists were refined after pilot trials of validity and reliability were conducted by seven experts, who tested the checklists on 10 articles.

Results. The checklist for studies of incidence or prevalence of chronic disease had six criteria for external validity and five for internal validity. The checklist for risk factor studies had 6 criteria for external validity, 13 criteria for internal validity, and 2 aspects of causality. A Microsoft Access database produced automated standardized reports about external and internal validities. Pilot testing demonstrated face and content validities and discrimination of reporting vs. methodological qualities. Interrater agreement was poor. The experts suggested future reliability testing of the checklists in systematic reviews with preplanned protocols, a priori consensus about research-specific quality criteria, and training of the reviewers.

Conclusions. We propose transparent and standardized quality assessment criteria of observational studies using the developed checklists. Future testing of the checklists in systematic reviews is necessary to develop reliable tools that can be used with confidence


Acciones

Information

5 responses

13 09 2012
Samantha

Does your website have a contact page? I’m having problems locating it but, I’d like to
shoot you an email. I’ve got some creative ideas for your blog you might be interested in hearing. Either way, great blog and I look forward to seeing it develop over time.

Me gusta

18 09 2012
it education

Asking questions are truly good thing if you are not understanding something fully, except this post offers nice understanding even.

Me gusta

20 11 2012
http://etacollege.com/dont-kid-yourself-about-responsib ility-and-accountability/

With having so much written content do you ever run into any issues of plagiarism or copyright violation?

My blog has a lot of completely unique content I’ve either created myself or outsourced but it seems a lot of it is popping it up all over the internet without my permission. Do you know any solutions to help protect against content from being stolen? I’d really appreciate it.

Me gusta

4 01 2013
hypnosis For Power

I don’t know whether it’s just me or if everybody else encountering issues with your blog.
It seems like some of the text on your content are
running off the screen. Can someone else please comment and let me know if this is happening
to them as well? This could be a problem with my web browser because
I’ve had this happen previously. Many thanks

Me gusta

6 01 2013
Technician Ultrasound

If you want to take a good deal from this article then you have to apply
such techniques to your won weblog.

Me gusta

Responder

Introduce tus datos o haz clic en un icono para iniciar sesión:

Logo de WordPress.com

Estás comentando usando tu cuenta de WordPress.com. Cerrar sesión / Cambiar )

Imagen de Twitter

Estás comentando usando tu cuenta de Twitter. Cerrar sesión / Cambiar )

Foto de Facebook

Estás comentando usando tu cuenta de Facebook. Cerrar sesión / Cambiar )

Google+ photo

Estás comentando usando tu cuenta de Google+. Cerrar sesión / Cambiar )

Conectando a %s




A %d blogueros les gusta esto: